Public Profile

Vithun S K

Full Stack Developer

9Repos

1Followers

6Following

out of 100

Junior

Confidence35% · Low

Skill Radar

Language Capabilities

Most used overallJavaScript61%3 languages coded

JavaScript

61%

CSS

32%

HTML

Overall Summary

Vithun demonstrates foundational full-stack development skills through a portfolio of small CRUD and utility applications built primarily in JavaScript and CSS. However, the complete absence of testing, CI/CD, licensing, and dependency management across all 9 repositories indicates early-career level work with significant gaps in professional engineering practices.

Strengths

Consistent project creation across multiple domains (Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, Recruitment-Management-System) showing breadth of interest in full-stack development
Every repository includes a README file, indicating awareness of basic documentation needs across Movie-Finder, Student-Managment-System, Lost-and-Found, Portfolio, Finance-Management, and others
JavaScript is used as the primary language in 5 of 9 repos (Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, Recruitment-Management-System, DSA-Tracker), showing language consistency

Missing

Category Breakdown — evidence for every score

Architecture 25Confidence30% · Low

Evidence

Multiple repos separated by concern (Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management) suggesting some project-level organization
Student-Managment-System uses CSS as primary language, suggesting a frontend-focused or template-based architecture
Recruitment-Management-System and DSA-Tracker are separate repos rather than monolithic, showing some project boundary awareness

Missing

Repository Intelligence

vithun-sk/Movie-Finder30

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Know your own score.

Connect GitHub and get your explainable Engineering Score in 60 seconds. Free.

Get your GitRating

Download this report

•Zero test files or testing frameworks detected across all 9 repositories, indicating no automated quality assurance practices
•No CI/CD pipelines, Dockerfiles, or deployment configurations found in any repository including Movie-Finder, Student-Managment-System, or Lost-and-Found
•No licenses in any of the 9 repositories, making all code technically all-rights-reserved and unusable by others
•No topics or tags on any repository, reducing discoverability and showing lack of project metadata hygiene
•Only 1 follower and minimal stars (3 total across all repos) suggest limited code review and community engagement
•No evidence of TypeScript usage despite JavaScript being primary language, missing an opportunity for type safety in Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, Recruitment-Management-System, and DSA-Tracker

Recommendations

Add MIT license to all public repositories

All 9 repos (Movie-Finder through Designora-LandingPage) lack any license, making code legally unusable by others and signaling unfamiliarity with open-source norms

Introduce unit testing in at least one JavaScript project

Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, Recruitment-Management-System, and DSA-Tracker have zero test coverage; adding Jest tests for core logic would demonstrate quality engineering

Add GitHub Actions CI workflow to run linting and tests on push

No CI/CD detected in any repository; adding a basic workflow to Movie-Finder or Finance-Management would show DevOps awareness

Migrate at least one JavaScript project to TypeScript

All JavaScript repos (Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, Recruitment-Management-System, DSA-Tracker) use plain JS with no type safety; converting DSA-Tracker would be a good starting point

Add repository topics/tags for discoverability

All 9 repos have no topics set, missing GitHub discoverability and metadata best practices

Backend 22Confidence25% · Low

Evidence

Finance-Management and Recruitment-Management-System likely involve backend logic for data management
Student-Managment-System implies CRUD backend operations
Lost-and-Found suggests some backend data persistence for item tracking

Missing

•No API documentation detected (OpenAPI/Swagger)
•No evidence of authentication or authorization implementation
•No database schema or migration files visible in repository metadata
•No server framework signals (Express, Fastify, etc.) confirmed from available data

Recommendations

Add API documentation to Recruitment-Management-System +5

Recruitment-Management-System likely has API endpoints but no API docs; adding OpenAPI/Swagger documentation would demonstrate backend engineering maturity

Code Quality 25Confidence25% · Low

Evidence

README present in all repos suggests some documentation discipline
Multiple repos with 0 open issues suggests issues are either not being filed or are being closed
Project naming is descriptive (Movie-Finder, Finance-Management, DSA-Tracker) rather than cryptic

Missing

•No linter configuration detected (ESLint, Prettier) in any repository
•No TypeScript or type checking signals
•No evidence of code review (1 follower, no PR signals)
•No error handling patterns visible from available metadata

Recommendations

Add ESLint and Prettier configuration to all JavaScript repositories +6

Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, Recruitment-Management-System, and DSA-Tracker have no linting; adding ESLint+Prettier would enforce consistent code quality

Complexity & Judgment 30Confidence20% · Low

Evidence

Project scope appears right-sized for a junior developer (Movie-Finder, Lost-and-Found, DSA-Tracker are appropriately scoped)
Multiple small projects rather than one over-engineered monolith suggests reasonable judgment
Portfolio and Designora-LandingPage show awareness of different project types (portfolio vs product landing)

Missing

•No evidence of tradeoff documentation or architectural decision records
•No evidence of choosing libraries over hand-rolling (or vice versa)
•No evidence of problem-solving beyond standard CRUD/tutorial patterns
•Cannot determine if solutions are original or tutorial-derived from available metadata
•No evidence of performance considerations or optimization decisions

Recommendations

Add a 'Design Decisions' section to Finance-Management README explaining key technical choices +3

Finance-Management README likely lacks design rationale; documenting why specific technologies/patterns were chosen would demonstrate engineering judgment

DevOps 8Confidence40% · Low

Evidence

No Dockerfiles detected in any of the 9 repositories
No GitHub Actions workflows found in any repository
No infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, CloudFormation) signals
No deployment configuration files (vercel.json, netlify.toml, etc.) detected

Missing

•CI/CD pipelines
•Docker/containerization
•Infrastructure as Code
•Environment separation (dev/staging/prod)
•Monitoring/logging integration (Sentry, DataDog, LogRocket)
•Deployment automation

Recommendations

Add a GitHub Actions workflow for Movie-Finder that runs lint checks on push +7

Movie-Finder has no CI; even a simple lint-on-push workflow would demonstrate DevOps awareness and is low-effort

Add a Dockerfile to Finance-Management for containerized deployment +5

Finance-Management has no containerization; adding a Dockerfile would demonstrate deployment readiness

Documentation 30Confidence45% · Low

Evidence

All 9 repositories have README files, showing basic documentation awareness
Project names are self-descriptive (Movie-Finder, Student-Managment-System, Lost-and-Found, Finance-Management, DSA-Tracker, Designora-LandingPage)
Profile bio identifies as Full Stack Developer, providing context for the portfolio

Missing

•No evidence of API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger)
•No changelogs or versioning (semantic versioning) detected
•No inline documentation signals (JSDoc, docstrings)
•No architecture decision records (ADRs)
•No contribution guidelines (CONTRIBUTING.md)
•Note: Student-Managment-System has a typo in repo name ('Managment' vs 'Management')

Recommendations

Expand README in Movie-Finder with setup instructions, screenshots, and tech stack +5

Movie-Finder has a README but likely lacks detailed setup instructions; a quality README with working setup steps is the most impactful documentation improvement

Rename Student-Managment-System to Student-Management-System +1

Student-Managment-System contains a spelling error ('Managment'); correcting it improves professional presentation

Frontend 35Confidence40% · Low

Evidence

Portfolio repo demonstrates frontend development capability with CSS as primary language
Designora-LandingPage is a dedicated frontend project showing landing page development skills
Student-Managment-System uses CSS as primary language, indicating UI-focused work
Movie-Finder and Lost-and-Found use JavaScript, likely with frontend DOM manipulation

Missing

•No evidence of modern frontend frameworks (React, Vue, Svelte)
•No CSS architecture signals (BEM, CSS modules, Tailwind, styled-components)
•No responsive design evidence from repository metadata
•No component library or design system usage detected

Recommendations

Migrate Portfolio to a modern framework like React or Next.js +8

Portfolio uses plain CSS; rebuilding with React/Next.js would demonstrate modern frontend engineering skills and improve employability

Maintainability 20Confidence25% · Low

Evidence

0 open issues across all repos could indicate either low usage or active issue management
Multiple repos are small, self-contained projects which are easier to maintain
Project separation (e.g., DSA-Tracker separate from Movie-Finder) shows some modular thinking

Missing

•No commit message quality signals (no evidence of conventional commits)
•No PR discipline visible (1 follower, no review signals)
•No refactoring evidence over time
•No dependency management signals (package-lock.json, yarn.lock visibility)
•No .gitignore evidence from metadata
•No evidence of dead code removal or code cleanup practices

Recommendations

Adopt conventional commit messages across all repositories +4

No repos show conventional commit discipline; adopting 'feat:', 'fix:', 'docs:' prefixes would improve maintainability and project history readability

Add .gitignore files to all repositories to exclude node_modules and build artifacts +3

No .gitignore signals detected; without proper gitignore, repos may contain committed build artifacts or dependencies

Security 15Confidence30% · Low

Evidence

No licenses in any repository, which while not a security issue per se, indicates unfamiliarity with open-source compliance
Finance-Management and Recruitment-Management-System likely handle sensitive data but no security signals detected
No authentication library references visible in repository metadata

Missing

•No evidence of input validation/sanitization
•No auth library usage (Auth0, Passport, Firebase Auth, NextAuth)
•No secrets management practices (.env.example, secrets scanning)
•No dependency vulnerability scanning (Dependabot, Snyk)
•No security headers or CSP configuration signals

Recommendations

Enable Dependabot alerts on all repositories +4

All 9 repos have no dependency vulnerability scanning; enabling Dependabot is a zero-effort security improvement

Add .env.example files and ensure no committed secrets in Finance-Management +5

Finance-Management likely handles financial data; establishing secrets management discipline is critical for this domain

Testing 5Confidence45% · Low

Evidence

No test files, test directories, or testing framework references detected in any of the 9 repositories
No CI configuration that could run tests found in any repository
No package.json test scripts detectable from available metadata

Missing

•Unit tests (Jest, Mocha, Jasmine)
•Integration tests
•End-to-end tests (Cypress, Playwright)
•Test coverage reporting
•CI pipeline executing tests

Recommendations

Add Jest tests for core utility functions in DSA-Tracker +10

DSA-Tracker likely contains algorithmic logic that is ideal for unit testing; adding Jest tests would be the most natural starting point for testing practices

vithun-sk/Student-Managment-System25

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Addresses a common real-world problem (student management) · Has a README file · 1 star indicates minimal external validation

Weaknesses

Repository name contains a spelling error ('Managment' should be 'Management') · No license detected · No testing, CI/CD, or deployment configuration · No topics/tags for discoverability

vithun-sk/Lost-and-Found28

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Solves a practical real-world problem (lost and found item tracking) · Has a README file · 1 star indicates minimal external validation · JavaScript usage suggests interactive frontend or full-stack implementation

Weaknesses

No license detected · No testing framework or test files detected · No CI/CD or deployment configuration · No topics/tags for discoverability

vithun-sk/Portfolio32

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Demonstrates self-presentation awareness with a dedicated portfolio project · CSS as primary language shows frontend design focus · Has a README file

Weaknesses

No license detected · No testing detected · No deployment configuration (Vercel/Netlify) for a portfolio that should be live · 0 stars suggests limited visibility

vithun-sk/Finance-Management25

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Addresses a meaningful domain (financial data management) · Has a README file · JavaScript usage suggests interactive functionality

Weaknesses

No license detected for code handling financial data · No security signals (auth, input validation, secrets management) for a sensitive domain · No testing detected for financial logic · No CI/CD or deployment configuration

vithun-sk/Recruitment-Management-System25

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Addresses a complex real-world domain (recruitment management) · Has a README file · JavaScript usage suggests full-stack implementation

Weaknesses

No license detected · No testing for recruitment workflow logic · No CI/CD or deployment configuration · No API documentation detected

vithun-sk/DSA-Tracker30

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Combines DSA practice with a tracking tool, showing meta-learning awareness · Has a README file · JavaScript usage suggests interactive tracking interface

Weaknesses

No license detected · No testing detected despite being a tracking tool that benefits from test coverage · No CI/CD or deployment configuration · No topics/tags for discoverability

vithun-sk/Designora-LandingPage28

Estimated Repository Score

Architecture

Documentation

Testing

Deployment

Security

Complexity

Maintainability

Strengths

Dedicated landing page project showing frontend marketing page skills · Has a README file · JavaScript usage suggests interactive UI elements

Weaknesses

No license detected · No testing detected · No deployment configuration for a landing page that should be live · No topics/tags for discoverability